Human-Social Robot Interaction in the Light of ToM and Metacognitive Functions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36560/17520241986Palavras-chave:
human-robot interaction, social robotics, theory of mind, metacognition, metareasoningResumo
Theory of Mind (ToM) and Metacognition constitute two superior mental mechanisms that promote the smooth integration and adaptation of the individual in society. In particular, the ability to read minds introduces the individual into the social world, contributing to understanding oneself and others. Metacognition focuses on individual knowledge, control, regulation, and readjustment regarding the cognitive mechanism and its influence on cognitive performance and the mental and social development of the individual. At the basis of the development of the two mechanisms is the activation of social interaction, which determines their levels of development. The innovative approaches and great expectations of technology and Artificial Intelligence for improving the artificial mind brought social robots to the fore. Robots with social action are gradually entering human life. Their interaction with the human factor is anticipated to become more and more frequent, expanded, and specialized. Hence, the investigation of equipping artificial systems with integrated social-cognitive and metacognitive capabilities was necessary, constituting the subject of study of the current narrative review. Research findings show that intelligent systems with introspection, self-evaluation, and perception-understanding of emotions, intentions, and beliefs can develop safe and satisfactory communication with humans as long as their design and operation conform to the code of ethics.
Referências
Abubshait, A., & Wiese, E. (2017). You look human, but act like a machine: agent appearance and behavior modulate different aspects of human–robot interaction. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 277299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01393
Astington, J. W. & Jenkins, J. M. (1995). Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition & Emotion, 9 (2-3), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508409006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508409006
Bakola, L. N., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2022). Emotional Intelligence vs. Artificial Intelligence: The interaction of human intelligence in evolutionary robotics. Research, Society and Development, 11(16). http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i16.36919
Bamicha, V., & Drigas, A. (2022a). The Evolutionary Course of Theory of Mind-Factors That Facilitate or Inhibit Its Operation & the Role of ICTs. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 30, 138-158. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v30i1.6220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v30i1.6220
Bamicha, V., & Drigas, A. (2022b). ToM & ASD: The interconnection of Theory of Mind with the social-emotional, cognitive development of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. The use of ICTs as an alternative form of intervention in ASD. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 33, 42-72. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5637-9601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v33i1.6845
Bamicha, V., & Drigas, A. (2023a). Consciousness influences in ToM and Metacognition functioning-An artificial intelligence perspective. Res earch, Society and Development, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i3.40420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i3.40420
Bamicha, V., & Drigas, A. (2023b). Theory of Mind in relation to Metacognition and ICTs. A metacognitive approach to ToM. Scientific Electronic Archives, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.36560/16420231711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36560/16420231711
Bamicha, V., & Salapata, Y. (2024). LLLT applications may enhance ASD aspects related to disturbances in the gut microbiome, mitochondrial activity, and neural network function. Brazilian Journal of Science, 3(1), 140-158. https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v3i1.457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v3i1.457
Bamicha, V., & Drigas, A. (2024). Strengthening AI via ToM and MC dimensions. Scientific Electronic Archives, 17(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.36560/17320241939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36560/17320241939
Banks, J. (2020). Theory of mind in social robots: Replication of five established human tests. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00588-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00588-x
Baraka, K., Alves-Oliveira, P., & Ribeiro, T. (2020). An extended framework for characterizing social robots. In: Jost, C., et al. Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_2
Basich, C., Biswas, J., & Zilberstein, S. (2023). Competence-Aware Autonomy: An Essential Skill for Robots in the Real World. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/search.Search.html?query=Competence-Aware+Autonomy%3A+An+Essential+Skill+for+Robots+in+the+Real+World&type=publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103844
Bianco, F., & Ognibene, D. (2019). Transferring adaptive theory of mind to social robots: Insights from developmental psychology to robotics. In Social Robotics: 11th International Conference, ICSR 2019, Madrid, Spain, November 26–29, 2019, Proceedings 11 (pp. 77-87). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_8
Breazeal, C., Gray, J., & Berlin, M. (2009). An embodied cognition approach to mindreading skills for socially intelligent robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 28(5), 656-680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364909102796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364909102796
Breazeal, C., Dautenhahn, K., & Kanda, T. (2016). Social robotics. Springer handbook of robotics, 1935-1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_72
Brock, L. L., Kim, H., Gutshall, C. C., & Grissmer, D. W. (2018). The development of theory of mind: Predictors and moderators of improvement in kindergarten. Early Child Development and Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1423481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1423481
Brooks, C., & Szafir, D. (2019). Building second-order mental models for human-robot interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06508. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.06508
Caro, M. F., Cox, M. T., & Toscano-Miranda, R. E. (2022). A Validated Ontology for Metareasoning in Intelligent Systems. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040113
Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2019). Self-Awareness Implied in Human and Robot Intentional Action. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Towards Conscious AI Systems. Retrieved from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2287/paper7.pdf
Cerrato, L., & Campbell, N. (2017). Engagement in dialogue with social robots. Dialogues with Social Robots: Enablements, Analyses, and Evaluation, 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2585-3_25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2585-3_25
Chaidi, E., Kefalis, C., Papagerasimou, Y., & Drigas, A. (2021). Educational robotics in Primary Education. A case in Greece. Research, Society and Development, 10(9), e17110916371-e17110916371. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.16371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.16371
Chella, A., Pipitone, A., Morin, A., & Racy, F. (2020). Developing self-awareness in robots via inner speech. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00016
Chella, A. (2022). Robots and machine consciousness. MIT Press, In Special Collection: CogNet. ISBN electronic: 9780262369329. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13780.003.0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13780.003.0029
Chen, X., Sui, Z., & Ji, J. (2013). Towards metareasoning for human-robot interaction. In Intelligent Autonomous Systems 12: Volume 2 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference IAS-12, held June 26-29, 2012, Jeju Island, Korea (pp. 355-367). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33932-5_34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33932-5_34
Chen, B., Vondrick, C., & Lipson, H. (2021). Visual behavior modelling for robotic theory of mind. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77918-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77918-x
Choi, J. J., Kim, Y. K., & Kwak, S. S. (2014). The autonomy levels and the human intervention levels of robots: The impact of robot types in human-robot interaction. In 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE RO-MAN 2014 (pp. 1069-1074). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926394
Clodic, A., & Alami, R. (2021). What Is It to Implement a Human-Robot Joint Action?. Robotics, AI, and Humanity: Science, Ethics, and Policy, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54173-6_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54173-6_19
Cox, M., & Raja, A. (2008). Metareasoning: A manifesto. BBN Technical.
Cross, E. S., Hortensius, R., & Wykowska, A. (2019). From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374(1771), 20180024. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0024
Daglarli, E. (2020). Computational modeling of prefrontal cortex for meta-cognition of a humanoid robot. IEEE Access, 8, 98491-98507. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998396
Danso, S., Annan, M. A. O., Ntem, M. T. K., Baah-Acheamfour, K., & Awudi, B. (2023). Artificial intelligence and human communication: A systematic literature review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(01), 1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.1.1495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.1.1495
Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological sciences, 362(1480), 679-704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
De Graaf, M. M., & Malle, B. F. (2017). How people explain action (and autonomous intelligent systems should too). In 2017 AAAI Fall Symposium Series. Retrieved from: https://cdn.aaai.org/ocs/16009/16009-69853-1-PB.pdf
De Santis, A., Siciliano, B., De Luca, A., & Bicchi, A. (2008). An atlas of physical human–robot interaction. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 43(3), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.003
Di Dio, C., Manzi, F., Peretti, G., Cangelosi, A., Harris, P. L., Massaro, D., & Marchetti, A. (2020). Shall I Trust You? From Child–Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469
Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2018). Mindfulness Training & Assessment and Intelligence. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 6(3), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v6i3.9248
Drakatos, N., & Christou, A. (2023). The impact of robotics on development, of hot and cold executive functions, and their role in improving them in special education. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 9(2), 070-080. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2023.9.2.0198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2023.9.2.0198
Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2018). Mindfulness Training & Assessment and Intelligence. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 6(3), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v6i3.9248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v6i3.9248
Drigas, A., & Sideraki, A. (2021). Emotional intelligence in autism. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 26, 80. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5178
Drigas, A., Papanastasiou, G., & Skianis, C. (2023). The school of the future: The role of digital technologies, metacognition and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 18(9), 65. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i09.38133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i09.38133
Drigas, A., & Bamicha, V. (2023). PoM & ToM-Harnessing the Power of Mind in Theory of Mind by shaping beneficial mental states in Preschoolers and the ICT’s role. Research, Society and Development, 12(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41590
Drigas, A., & Papoutsi, C. (2023). A New Pyramid Model of Empathy: The Role of ICTs and Robotics on Empathy. Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng., 19(2), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i02.33591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i02.33591
Iasechko, M., Kharlamov, M., Gontarenko, L., Skrypchuk, H., Fadyeyeva, K., & Sviatnaia, O. (2021). Artificial intelligence as a technology of the future at the present stage of development of society. Laplage em Revista (International), n. Extra D, 7, 391-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1119p.391-397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1119p.391-397
Incao, S., Rea, F., & Sciutti, A. (2021). A Self for robots: core elements and ascription by humans. Interactions, 5(14), 15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5645583
Fabbro, F., Cantone, D., Feruglio, S., & Crescentini, C. (2019). Origin and evolution of human consciousness. Progress in Brain Research, 250, 317-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.031
Frasca, T., Krause, E., Thielstrom, R., & Scheutz, M. (2020). " Can you do this?" Self-Assessment Dialogues with Autonomous Robots Before, During, and After a Mission. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01544. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.01544
Frith, U. & Happé, F.G.E (1999). Theory of Mind and Self-Consciousness: What Is It Like to Be Autistic? Mind & Language, 14 (1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00100
Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. (2012). Mechanisms of Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 63:287-313. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449
Haddadin, S., & Croft, E. (2016). Physical human–robot interaction. Springer handbook of robotics, 1835-1874. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_69
Hampton, R. R. (2009). Multiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhumans: Converging evidence or multiple mechanisms? Comparative cognition & behavior reviews, 4, 17. https://doi.org/10.3819%2Fccbr.2009.40002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2009.40002
He, H., Gray, J., Cangelosi, A., Meng, Q., McGinnity, T. M., & Mehnen, J. (2021). The challenges and opportunities of human-centered AI for trustworthy robots and autonomous systems. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 14(4), 1398-1412. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2021.3132282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2021.3132282
Hegel, F., Krach, S., Kircher, T., Wrede, B., & Sagerer, G. (2008, March). Theory of mind (ToM) on robots: A functional neuroimaging study. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349866
Geraci, A., D'Amico, A., Pipitone, A., Seidita, V., & Chella, A. (2021). Automation inner speech as an anthropomorphic feature affecting human trust: Current issues and future directions. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 620026. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.620026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.620026
Gloor, J. L., Howe, L., De Cremer, D., & Yam, K. C. S. (2020). The funny thing about robot leadership. European Business Law Review, online. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/111535
Goel, A. K., Fitzgerald, T., & Parashar, P. (2020). Analogy and metareasoning: Cognitive strategies for robot learning. In Human-Machine shared contexts (pp. 23-44). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820543-3.00002-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820543-3.00002-X
González-Docasal, A., Aceta, C., Arzelus, H., Álvarez, A., Fernández, I., & Kildal, J. (2021). Towards a natural human-robot interaction in an industrial environment. Conversational Dialogue Systems for the Next Decade, 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8395-7_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8395-7_18
Görür, O. C., & Albayrak, Ş. (2016). A cognitive architecture incorporating theory of mind in social robots towards their personal assistance at home. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Bio-inspired Social Robot Learning in Home Scenarios at IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2016 (IROS’16).
Görür, O., Rosman, B. S., Hoffman, G., & Albayrak, S. (2017). Toward integrating Theory of Mind into adaptive decision-making of social robots to understand human intention. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9653
Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. European journal of clinical investigation, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.1111%2Feci.12931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
Gutiérrez, S. M., & Steinbauer-Wagner, G. (2022). The Need for a Meta-Architecture for Robot Autonomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09712. https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.362.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.362.9
Javaid, M., Estivill-Castro, V., & Hexel, R. (2020). Enhancing humans trust and perception of robots through explanations. Proceedings of the ACHI, 10(1912), 4071. https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/4071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010051
Jokinen, K. (2021). Exploring Boundaries Among Interactive Robots and Humans. In: D'Haro, L.F., Callejas, Z., Nakamura, S. (eds) Conversational Dialogue Systems for the Next Decade. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 704. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8395-7_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8395-7_20
Joksimovic, S., Ifenthaler, D., Marrone, R., De Laat, M., & Siemens, G. (2023). Opportunities of artificial intelligence for supporting complex problem-solving: Findings from a scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100138
Jung, M., & Hinds, P. (2018). Robots in the wild: A time for more robust theories of human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 7(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3208975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3208975
Kaivo-Oja, J., Roth, S., & Westerlund, L. (2017). Futures of robotics. Human work in digital transformation. International Journal of Technology Management, 73(4), 176-205. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2017.083074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2017.083074
Karyotaki, M., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2024). Mobile/VR/Robotics/IoT-Based Chatbots and Intelligent Personal Assistants for Social Inclusion. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i08.46473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i08.46473
Kneer, M. (2021). Can a robot lie? Exploring the folk concept of lying as applied to artificial agents. Cognitive Science, 45(10), e13032. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13032
Kralik, J. D., Lee, J. H., Rosenbloom, P. S., Jackson Jr, P. C., Epstein, S. L., Romero, O. J., ... & McGreggor, K. (2018). Metacognition for a common model of cognition. Procedia computer science, 145, 730-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.046
Lasota, P. A.; Fong, T.; & Shah, J. A. (2017). A survey of methods for safe human-robot interaction. Foundations and Trends in Robotics, 5(4):261–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2300000052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/2300000052
Losey, D. P., McDonald, C. G., Battaglia, E., & O'Malley, M. K. (2018). A review of intent detection, arbitration, and communication aspects of shared control for physical human–robot interaction. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 70(1), 010804. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039145
Lu, M. (2023). The ability and importance of human communication in the age of AI. Geographical Research Bulletin, 2, 187-189. https://doi.org/10.50908/grb.2.0_187
Malle, B. F., & Scheutz, M. (2019). Learning how to behave: Moral competence for social robots. Handbuch maschinenethik, 255-278. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17483-5_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17483-5_17
Martini, M. C., Buzzell, G. A., & Wiese, E. (2015). Agent appearance modulates mind attribution and social attention in human-robot interaction. In Social Robotics: 7th International Conference, ICSR 2015, Paris, France, October 26-30, 2015, Proceedings 7 ,431-439. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_43
Martini, M. C., Gonzalez, C. A., & Wiese, E. (2016). Seeing minds in others–Can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PloS one, 11(1), e0146310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146310
Miranda, A., Berenguer. C., Roselló, B., Baixauli, I. & Colomer, C. (2017). Social Cognition in Children with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Associations with Executive Functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:1035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01035
Mitsea, E., Lytra, N., Akrivopoulou, A., & Drigas, A. (2020). Metacognition, Mindfulness and Robots for Autism Inclusion. Int. J. Recent Contributions Eng. Sci. IT, 8(2), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v8i2.14213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v8i2.14213
Mishra, D., Lugo, R.G., Parish, K., Tilden, S. (2023). Metacognitive Processes Involved in Human Robot Interaction in the School Learning Environment. In: Kurosu, M., Hashizume, A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35599-8_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35599-8_6
Moraiti, I., & Drigas, A. (2023). AI Tools Like ChatGPT for People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 19(16). DOI:10.3991/ijoe.v19i16.43399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i16.43399
Natarajan, M., Seraj, E., Altundas, B., Paleja, R., Ye, S., Chen, L., ... & Gombolay, M. (2023). Human-robot teaming: grand challenges. Current Robotics Reports, 4(3), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-023-00103-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-023-00103-1
Ntaountaki, P., Lorentzou, G., Lykothanasi, A., Anagnostopoulou, P., Alexandropoulou, V., & Drigas, A. (2019). Robotics in Autism Intervention. Int. J. Recent Contributions Eng. Sci. IT, 7(4), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v7i4.11448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v7i4.11448
Onnasch, L., & Roesler, E. (2021). A taxonomy to structure and analyze human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(4), 833-849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00666-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00666-5
Pergantis, P., & Drigas, A. (2023). Sensory integration therapy as enabler for developing emotional intelligence in children with autism spectrum disorder and the ICT’s role. Brazilian Journal of Science, 2(12), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v2i12.422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v2i12.422
Pergantis, P. (2024). A new era of ICTs for combating symptoms of neurodevelopmental disorders. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 18(1), 036-047. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.18.1.0145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.18.1.0145
Pergantis, P., & Drigas, A. (2024). The Effect of Drones in the Educational Process: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060665
Pipitone, A., Lanza, F., Seidita, V., & Chella, A. (2019, March). Inner Speech for a Self-Conscious Robot. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Towards Conscious AI Systems. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2287/paper14.pdf
Pipitone, A., Geraci, A., D’Amico, A., Seidita, V., & Chella, A. (2023). Robot’s inner speech effects on human trust and anthropomorphism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01002-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01002-3
Rakoczy, H. (2022). Foundations of theory of mind and its development in early childhood. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(4), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00037-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00037-z
Rosenthal, D. M. (2005). Consciousness and Mind. Oxford University Press.Rother, E. T. (2007). Systematic literature review X narrative review. Acta paulista de enfermagem, 20, v-vi. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001
Rossi, A., Rossi, S., Andriella, A., & van Maris, A. (2022, March). The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS (TRAITS) Workshop. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 1284-1286). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889348
Sandini, G., Sciutti, A., & Vernon, D. (2021). Cognitive robotics. In Encyclopedia of Robotics (pp. 1-7). Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41610-1_198-1
SCASSELLATI, B. (2002). Theory of Mind for a Humanoid Robot. Autonomous Robots, 12, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013298507114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013298507114
Schleidgen, S., & Friedrich, O. (2022). Joint Interaction and Mutual Understanding in Social Robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(6), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00407-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00407-z
Sheridan, T. B. (2016). Human–robot interaction: status and challenges. Human factors, 58(4), 525-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364
Shmatko, N., & Volkova, G. (2020). Bridging the skill gap in robotics: Global and national environment. Sage Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020958736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020958736
Sideraki, A., & Drigas, A. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Autism. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 26, 262. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5208
Syriopoulou-Delli, C., Deres, I., & Drigas, A. (2021). Intervention program using a robot for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Research, Society and Development, 10(8), e35010817512-e35010817512. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17512
Thellman, S., Silvervarg, A., & Ziemke, T. (2017). Folk-Psychological Interpretation of Human vs. Humanoid Robot Behavior: Exploring the Intentional Stance toward Robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 280953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01962
Thellman, S., De Graaf, M., & Ziemke, T. (2022). Mental state attribution to robots: A systematic review of conceptions, methods, and findings. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(4), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3526112
Vernon, D., Thill, S., & Ziemke, T. (2016). The Role of Intention in Cognitive Robotics. In: Esposito, A., Jain, L. (eds) Toward Robotic Socially Believable Behaving Systems - Volume I. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 105. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31056-5_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31056-5_3
Vinanzi, S., Patacchiola, M., Chella, A., & Cangelosi, A. (2019). Would a robot trust you? Developmental robotics model of trust and theory of mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374(1771), 20180032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0032
Vinanzi, S., Cangelosi, A., & Goerick, C. (2021). The collaborative mind: intention reading and trust in human-robot interaction. Iscience, 24(2). doi: 10.1109/DEVLRN.2019.8850698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102130
Vouglanis, T. (2023). The use of robotics in the education of students with special educational needs. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(1), 464-471. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.1.1331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.1.1331
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Eds.). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000
Wallach, W., Franklin, S., & Allen, C. (2010). A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents. Topics in cognitive science, 2(3), 454-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x
Wang, Z., & Frye, D. A. (2021). When a Circle Becomes the Letter O: Young Children’s Conceptualization of Learning and Its Relation With Theory of Mind Development. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 596419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596419
Whitebread, D., Almeqdad, Q., Bryce, D., Demetriou, D., Grau, V., & Sangster, C. (2010). Metacognition in young children: Current methodological and theoretical developments. Trends and prospects in metacognition research, 233-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_11
Wiese, E., Metta, G., & Wykowska, A. (2017). Robots as intentional agents: using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 281017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01663
Williams, J., Fiore, S. M., & Jentsch, F. (2022). Supporting Artificial Social Intelligence With Theory of Mind. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 5, 750763. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.750763n DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.750763
Worley, P. (2018). Plato, metacognition and philosophy in schools. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1). http://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v5i1.1486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21913/JPS.v5i1.1486
Wortham, R. H., Theodorou, A., & Bryson, J. J. (2016, June). What does the robot think? Transparency as a fundamental design requirement for intelligent systems. In IJCAI 2016 Ethics for AI Workshop. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/50294/1/WorthamTheodorouBryson{_}EFAI16.pdf
Xu, T., Zhang, H., & Yu, C. (2016). See you see me: The role of eye contact in multimodal human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 6(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2882970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2882970
Yang, G. Z., Dario, P., & Kragic, D. (2018). Social robotics—Trust, learning, and social interaction. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaau8839. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aau8839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aau8839
Zouganeli, E., & Lentzas, A. (2022). Cognitive robotics-towards the development of next-generation robotics and intelligent systems. In Symposium of the Norwegian AI Society (pp. 16-25). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17030-0_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17030-0_2
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Scientific Electronic Archives
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A revista se reserva o direito de fazer altera
